[Exploration and validation of optimal cut-off values for tPSA and fPSA/tPSA screening of prostate cancer at different ages].

Objective: To determine the total and age-specific cut-off values of total prostate specific antigen (tPSA) and the ratio of free PSA divided total PSA (fPSA/tPSA) for screening prostate cancer in China. Methods: Based on the Chinese Colorectal, Breast, Lung, Liver, and Stomach cancer Screening Trial (C-BLAST) and the Tianjin Common Cancer Case Cohort (TJ4C), males who were not diagnosed with any cancers at baseline since 2017 and received both tPSA and fPSA testes were selected. Based on Cox regression, the overall and age-specific (＜60, 60-＜70, and ≥70 years) accuracy and optimal cut-off values of tPSA and fPSA/tPSA ratio for screening prostate cancer were evaluated with time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve (tdROC) and area under curve (AUC). Bootstrap resampling was used to internally validate the stability of the optimal cut-off value, and the PLCO study was used to externally validate the accuracy under different cut-off values. Results: A total of 5 180 participants were included in the study, and after a median follow-up of 1.48 years, a total of 332 prostate cancer patients were included. In the total population, the tdAUC of tPSA and fPSA/tPSA screening for prostate cancer were 0.852 and 0.748, respectively, with the optimal cut-off values of 5.08 ng/ml and 0.173, respectively. After age stratification, the age specific cut-off values of tPSA in the <60, 60-<70, and ≥70 age groups were 3.13, 4.82, and 11.54 ng/ml, respectively, while the age-specific cut-off values of fPSA/tPSA were 0.153, 0.135, and 0.130, respectively. Under the age-specific cut-off values, the sensitivities of tPSA screening for prostate cancer in males <60, 60-70, and ≥70 years old were 92.3%, 82.0%, and 77.6%, respectively, while the specificities were 84.7%, 81.3%, and 75.4%, respectively. The age-specific sensitivities of fPSA/tPSA for screening prostate cancer were 74.4%, 53.3%, and 55.9%, respectively, while the specificities were 83.8%, 83.7%, and 83.7%, respectively. Both bootstrap's internal validation and PLCO external validation provided similar results. The combination of tPSA and fPSA/tPSA could further improve the accuracy of screening. Conclusion: To improve the screening effects, it is recommended that age-specific cut-off values of tPSA and fPSA/tPSA should be used to screen for prostate cancer in the general risk population.

Relationship between circulating FSH levels and body composition and bone health in patients with prostate cancer who undergo androgen deprivation therapy: The BLADE study.

Background: Among its extragonadal effects, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) has an impact on body composition and bone metabolism. Since androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has a profound impact on circulating FSH concentrations, this hormone could potentially be implicated in the changes of fat body mass (FBM), lean body mass (LBM), and bone fragility induced by ADT. The objective of this study is to correlate FSH serum levels with body composition parameters, bone mineral density (BMD), and bone turnover markers at baseline conditions and after 12 months of ADT. Methods: Twenty-nine consecutive non-metastatic prostate cancer (PC) patients were enrolled from 2017 to 2019 in a phase IV study. All patients underwent administration of the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone antagonist degarelix. FBM, LBM, and BMD were evaluated by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry at baseline and after 12 months of ADT. FSH, alkaline phosphatase, and C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen were assessed at baseline and after 6 and 12 months. For outcome measurements and statistical analysis, t-test or sign test and Pearson or Spearman tests for continuous variables were used when indicated. Results: At baseline conditions, a weak, non-significant, direct relationship was found between FSH serum levels and FBM at arms (r = 0.36) and legs (r = 0.33). Conversely, a stronger correlation was observed between FSH and total FBM (r = 0.52, p = 0.006), fat mass at arms (r = 0.54, p = 0.004), and fat mass at trunk (r = 0.45, p = 0.018) assessed after 12 months. On the other hand, an inverse relationship between serum FSH and appendicular lean mass index/FBM ratio was observed (r = -0.64, p = 0.001). This is an ancillary study of a prospective trial and this is the main limitation. Conclusions: FSH serum levels after ADT could have an impact on body composition, in particular on FBM. Therefore, FSH could be a promising marker to monitor the risk of sarcopenic obesity and to guide the clinicians in the tailored evaluation of body composition in PC patients undergoing ADT. Funding: This research was partially funded by Ferring Pharmaceuticals. The funder had no role in design and conduct of the study, collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data and in preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript. Clinical trial number: clinicalTrials.gov NCT03202381, EudraCT Number 2016-004210-10.

Treatments given to cancer patients can cause negative side effects. For example, a treatment known as androgen deprivation therapy ­ which is used to reduce male sex hormone levels in prostate cancer patients ­ can lead to increased body fat percentage and decreased bone density. These adverse effects can have further negative impacts on patient health, such as increasing the risk of cardiovascular disease and fractures from falls from standing height or less, respectively. Understanding how androgen deprivation therapy contributes to these negative side effects may help clinicians better manage care and outcomes for patients with prostate cancer. Follicle stimulating hormone (or FSH for short) has roles in male and female reproduction but has also been linked to changes in body composition. For example, elevated FSH levels are associated with higher total fat body mass in post-menopausal women. While androgen deprivation therapy is known to alter FSH blood levels, the impact of this change in prostate cancer patients was not well understood. To investigate the effect of androgen deprivation therapy on FSH levels and body composition, Bergamini et al. used X-ray technology to measure total fat body mass in prostate cancer patients before and after undergoing 12 months of androgen deprivation therapy. The findings showed that patient FSH blood levels significantly decreased after 12 months of treatment. Higher FSH blood levels strongly correlated with increased total fat body mass after 12 months of treatment. The findings of this clinical trial suggest that FSH blood levels impact the body composition of patients undergoing androgen deprivation therapy. As a result, FSH blood levels may be a suitable biomarker for identifying patients that are more likely to develop obesity and are therefore at greater risk of complications such as cardiovascular disease.

Limited prognostic role of routine serum markers (AP, CEA, LDH and NSE) in oligorecurrent prostate cancer patients undergoing PSMA-radioguided surgery.

INTRODUCTION: We evaluated the prognostic role of pre-salvage prostate-specific membrane antigen-radioguided surgery (PSMA-RGS) serum levels of alkaline phosphatase (AP), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and neuron-specific enolase (NSE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who consecutively underwent PSMA-RGS for prostate cancer (PCa) oligorecurrence between January 2019 and January 2022 were selected. Biomarkers were assessed one day before surgery. Cox regression and logistic regression models tested the relationship between biochemical recurrence-free survival (BFS), 6- and 12-month biochemical recurrence (BCR), and several independent variables, including biomarkers. RESULTS: 153 consecutive patients were analyzed. In the univariable Cox regression analysis, none of the biomarkers achieved predictor status (AP: hazard ratio [HR] = 1.03, 95% CI 0.99, 1.01; p = 0.19; CEA: HR = 1.73, 95% CI 0.94, 1.21; p = 0.34; LDH: HR = 1.01, 95% CI 1.00, 1.01; p = 0.05; NSE: HR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.98, 1.06; p = 0.39). The only independent predictor of BFS was the number of positive lesions on PSMA PET (HR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.02, 1.30; p = 0.03). The number of positive lesions was confirmed as independent predictor for BCR within 6 and 12 months (BCR < 6 months: odds ratio [OR] = 1.1, 95% CI 1.0, 1.3; p = 0.04; BCR < 12 months: OR = 1.1, 95% CI 1.0, 1.3; p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The assessment of AP, CEA, LDH, and NSE before salvage PSMA-RGS showed no prognostic impact. Further studies are needed to identify possible predictors that will optimize patient selection for salvage PSMA-RGS.

Analysis of Factors Influencing Bone Metastasis in Prostate Cancer and Diagnostic Value of Serum PSA, CysC and D-D

Objective: This study aims to analyse factors influencing bone metastasis in prostate cancer and the diagnostic value of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and D-dimer (D-D) combined with cystatin C (CysC) in bone metastasis of prostate cancer. Methods: Data of 116 patients with prostate cancer admitted to our hospital were retrospectively analysed. They were divided into two groups: Bone metastasis group (46 cases) and non-bone metastasis group (70 cases). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine factors influencing bone metastasis in prostate cancer. The values of serum PSA, D-D and CysC were identified using a receiver operating characteristic diagnostic curve. Results: Of the 116 patients, 46 had bone metastases and 70 had non-bone metastases. Among 46 patients with bone metastasis, 8 cases (17.39%) had single bone metastasis and 38 cases (82.61%) had multiple bone metastasis. Based on the univariate analysis, bone metastasis was associated with increases in Gleason score, clinical stage, lymph node metastasis, systemic inflammatory response index, fibrinogen to albumin ratio and alkaline phosphatase and fibrinogen levels. The Gleason score was higher than 8 points, the clinical stages ranged from T3 to T4 and the serum levels of PSA, D-D and CysC were higher in the bone metastasis group (p < 0.05). The combined value of serum PSA, D-D and CysC in the diagnosis of bone metastasis in prostate cancer was higher than the three indicators alone. Conclusions: Lymph node metastasis in T3–T4 clinical stages with Gleason score >8 was a risk factor for bone metastasis in prostate cancer (all p < 0.05). The risk of bone metastasis in patients with prostate cancer increases with increasing Gleason clinical stage and the occurrence of lymph node metastasis. Serum PSA, D-D and CysC have certain diagnostic value in the diagnosis of bone metastasis, and their combination has the highest value (AU)

Functional Outcomes After Localized Prostate Cancer Treatment.

Importance: Adverse outcomes associated with treatments for localized prostate cancer remain unclear. Objective: To compare rates of adverse functional outcomes between specific treatments for localized prostate cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: An observational cohort study using data from 5 US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program registries. Participants were treated for localized prostate cancer between 2011 and 2012. At baseline, 1877 had favorable-prognosis prostate cancer (defined as cT1-cT2bN0M0, prostate-specific antigen level <20 ng/mL, and grade group 1-2) and 568 had unfavorable-prognosis prostate cancer (defined as cT2cN0M0, prostate-specific antigen level of 20-50 ng/mL, or grade group 3-5). Follow-up data were collected by questionnaire through February 1, 2022. Exposures: Radical prostatectomy (n = 1043), external beam radiotherapy (n = 359), brachytherapy (n = 96), or active surveillance (n = 379) for favorable-prognosis disease and radical prostatectomy (n = 362) or external beam radiotherapy with androgen deprivation therapy (n = 206) for unfavorable-prognosis disease. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes were patient-reported sexual, urinary, bowel, and hormone function measured using the 26-item Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (range, 0-100; 100 = best). Associations of specific therapies with each outcome were estimated and compared at 10 years after treatment, adjusting for corresponding baseline scores, and patient and tumor characteristics. Minimum clinically important differences were 10 to 12 for sexual function, 6 to 9 for urinary incontinence, 5 to 7 for urinary irritation, and 4 to 6 for bowel and hormone function. Results: A total of 2445 patients with localized prostate cancer (median age, 64 years; 14% Black, 8% Hispanic) were included and followed up for a median of 9.5 years. Among 1877 patients with favorable prognosis, radical prostatectomy was associated with worse urinary incontinence (adjusted mean difference, -12.1 [95% CI, -16.2 to -8.0]), but not worse sexual function (adjusted mean difference, -7.2 [95% CI, -12.3 to -2.0]), compared with active surveillance. Among 568 patients with unfavorable prognosis, radical prostatectomy was associated with worse urinary incontinence (adjusted mean difference, -26.6 [95% CI, -35.0 to -18.2]), but not worse sexual function (adjusted mean difference, -1.4 [95% CI, -11.1 to 8.3), compared with external beam radiotherapy with androgen deprivation therapy. Among patients with unfavorable prognosis, external beam radiotherapy with androgen deprivation therapy was associated with worse bowel (adjusted mean difference, -4.9 [95% CI, -9.2 to -0.7]) and hormone (adjusted mean difference, -4.9 [95% CI, -9.5 to -0.3]) function compared with radical prostatectomy. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients treated for localized prostate cancer, radical prostatectomy was associated with worse urinary incontinence but not worse sexual function at 10-year follow-up compared with radiotherapy or surveillance among people with more favorable prognosis and compared with radiotherapy for those with unfavorable prognosis. Among men with unfavorable-prognosis disease, external beam radiotherapy with androgen deprivation therapy was associated with worse bowel and hormone function at 10-year follow-up compared with radical prostatectomy.

Evaluation on Diagnostic Value of Ultrasonic Elastography Parameters and Serum Testosterone in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer

Objective: To explore the clinical diagnostic value of ultrasound elastography (UE) combined with serum testosterone (T) detection in prostate cancer (PCa). Method: A total of 155 patients with suspected PCa admitted to Affiliated Qingdao Third People’s Hospital from January 2020 to January 2022 were included in this study. All the patients underwent UE detection and serum T examination and were divided into positive and negative groups based on histopathological examination results. The detection rates of UE detection, serum T detection and combined detection of the two were compared. T test, nonparametric test and binary logistic regression were used for statistical analysis. The diagnostic efficiencies of single and combined detection were analysed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Result: After the pathological confirmation, 71 cases were classified under the positive group and 84 cases in the negative group. The positive group had significantly higher elastic strain ratio and elastic-image compression index level and a significantly lower serum T level than the negative group (p < 0.05). Elastic strain ratio, elastic image compression index and serum T level were all risk factors for PCa (p < 0.05). ROC analysis showed that the sensitivity of combined detection was significantly higher than that of single detection.Conclusions: Offering a certain clinical application value, the application of combined UE and serum T detection in the clinical diagnosis of PCa can compensate for the shortcomings of single diagnosis, improve diagnostic sensitivity and accuracy and provide a new direction for the clinical diagnosis of PCa (AU)

Improved Outcomes with Enzalutamide in Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Patients with prostate cancer who have high-risk biochemical recurrence have an increased risk of progression. The efficacy and safety of enzalutamide plus androgen-deprivation therapy and enzalutamide monotherapy, as compared with androgen-deprivation therapy alone, are unknown. METHODS: In this phase 3 trial, we enrolled patients with prostate cancer who had high-risk biochemical recurrence with a prostate-specific antigen doubling time of 9 months or less. Patients were randomly assigned, in a 1:1:1 ratio, to receive enzalutamide (160 mg) daily plus leuprolide every 12 weeks (combination group), placebo plus leuprolide (leuprolide-alone group), or enzalutamide monotherapy (monotherapy group). The primary end point was metastasis-free survival, as assessed by blinded independent central review, in the combination group as compared with the leuprolide-alone group. A key secondary end point was metastasis-free survival in the monotherapy group as compared with the leuprolide-alone group. Other secondary end points were patient-reported outcomes and safety. RESULTS: A total of 1068 patients underwent randomization: 355 were assigned to the combination group, 358 to the leuprolide-alone group, and 355 to the monotherapy group. The patients were followed for a median of 60.7 months. At 5 years, metastasis-free survival was 87.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 83.0 to 90.6) in the combination group, 71.4% (95% CI, 65.7 to 76.3) in the leuprolide-alone group, and 80.0% (95% CI, 75.0 to 84.1) in the monotherapy group. With respect to metastasis-free survival, enzalutamide plus leuprolide was superior to leuprolide alone (hazard ratio for metastasis or death, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.61; P<0.001); enzalutamide monotherapy was also superior to leuprolide alone (hazard ratio for metastasis or death, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.87; P = 0.005). No new safety signals were observed, with no substantial between-group differences in quality-of-life measures. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with prostate cancer with high-risk biochemical recurrence, enzalutamide plus leuprolide was superior to leuprolide alone with respect to metastasis-free survival; enzalutamide monotherapy was also superior to leuprolide alone. The safety profile of enzalutamide was consistent with that shown in previous clinical studies, with no apparent detrimental effect on quality of life. (Funded by Pfizer and Astellas Pharma; EMBARK ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02319837.).

The Value of Combined Detection of Serum PSA, MALAT1 and TMPRSS2-ETV1 in Evaluating the Progress and Prognosis of Prostate Cancer

Objective: To explore the prognostic value of combined detection of serum prostate specific antigen (PSA), lung cancer metastasis-associated transcript 1 (MALAT1), transmembrane serine protease 2 (TMPRSS2), and erythropoietin-specific transforming gene variant 1 (ETV1) in prostate cancer. Methods: Ninety patients with prostate cancer who were treated in hospital were divided into two groups according to tumor node metastasis stage: Stage I−II group (n = 34) and stage III−IV group (n = 56). The serum levels of PSA, MALAT1, and TMPRSS2-ETV1 were detected in both groups and correlated with prostate cancer status to determine their value as indicators of disease progression and prognosis. Results: Age, body mass index (BMI), and Gleason score differed significantly between the study group and the control group (p < 0.05). The expression levels of serum PSA and MALAT1 were higher in group III–IV than in group I–II, and the positive expression rate of TMPRSS2-ETV1 was significantly higher in group III–IV than in the control group (p < 0.05). Pearson’s correlation analysis showed that serum PSA, MALAT1, and TMPRSS2-ETV1 were significantly correlated with prostate cancer (p < 0.05). Differences in PSA levels correlated with differences in age, BMI, type of pathology, and Gleason score, whereas differences in serum MALAT1 levels correlated with differences in age, BMI, and type of pathology. Gleason scores differed significantly between patients with positive and negative TMPRSS2-ETV1 indicators (p < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that serum PSA, MALAT1, and TMPRSS2-ETV1 were independent risk factors affecting the prognosis of prostate cancer (p < 0.05). The areas under the curve (AUCs) of serum PSA, MALAT1, and TMPRSS2-ETV1 as prognostic predictors in prostate cancer were 0.692, 0.731, and 0.709, respectively, whereas the AUC of the combination was 0.819 (AU)

BOP1 Promotes Prostate Cancer through the DUSP6/MAPK Pathway

Background: Nucleolar prominence is a biomarker of prostate cancer (CaP), and the nucleolar protein block of proliferation 1 (BOP1) participates in the development of CaP, which has great significance for CaP therapy. Thus, this study explored the mechanism of BOP1 in CaP development. Methods: BOP1 expression levels in the tumor tissues of CaP patients and in PC3 tumor cells were determined. The viability, apoptosis rate of PC3 cells, and apoptosis-related proteins levels were determined to explore the effect of BOP1 on tumor-cell growth in vitro. BOP1 function in the metastasis of PC3 cells was further assessed by Transwell experiment. We also studied the influence of BOP1 on the expression of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway-related proteins and investigated the regulatory effect of BOP1 on dual-specificity phosphatase 6 (DUSP6). Results: BOP1 expression was upregulated in the tumor tissues and PC3 cells of CaP patients. BOP1 knockout reduced the activity of PC3 cells and induced apoptosis, significantly inhibiting the metastasis of PC3 cells. DUSP6 was overexpressed in tumor tissues and PC3 cells. BOP1 knockout inhibited DUSP6 expression and the MAPK pathway. DUSP6 overexpression reversed the inhibition of BOP1 siRNA (si-BOP1) on PC3 cells and the activated MAPK signaling pathway. Conclusions: This finding demonstrated that BOP1 promoted CaP progression by regulating the DUSP6/MAPK pathway (AU)

Factores clínicos e histológicos predictores de reclasificación en pacientes incluidos en programa de vigilancia activa de cáncer de próstata / Clinical and histological predictive factors of reclassification of prostate cancer patients on active surveillance

Introducción y objetivo La vigilancia activa (VA) se ha establecido como estrategia terapéutica en pacientes con cáncer de próstata de bajo riesgo. Se han identificado factores demográficos y anatomopatológicos que aumentan la probabilidad de reclasificar a los enfermos. Materiales y métodos Se han recogido datos analíticos e histopatológicos de 116 pacientes incluidos en VA desde 2014. Se ha realizado un análisis univariante con X2, t de Student y Tau de Kendall, un análisis multivariante según regresión logística y se han calculado las curvas de Kaplan-Meier. Resultados De los 116 pacientes en VA, la mediana de edad al diagnóstico fue 66 años y la mediana de seguimiento fueron 13 meses (2-72). De todos ellos, 61 (52,6%) siguen en vigilancia mientras que 55 (47,4%) han salido del programa, la mayoría por progresión histológica (52 pacientes [45,2%]), realizándose prostatectomía radical en 27 (49,1%). El volumen prostático (Vp) ≤ 60cc y el número de cilindros positivos >1 en la biopsia diagnóstica (p = 0,05) se asociaron con mayor tasa de reclasificación en el análisis univariante (p < 0,05). En el análisis multivariante, estas dos variables se correlacionaron significativamente con una mayor tasa de reclasificación (Vp ≤ 60 cc: OR 4,39, p = 0,04; >1 cilindro positivo en la biopsia diagnóstica: OR 2,48, p = 0,03). Conclusiones Se ha objetivado que el volumen ecográfico inicial y el número de cilindros positivos en la biopsia diagnóstica son factores de riesgo independientes para la reclasificación. El antígeno prostático específico (PSA) inicial, la lateralidad de los cilindros afectos y la densidad de PSA no fueron elementos predictores de progresión en nuestra serie (AU)

Introduction and Objective Active surveillance (AS) has been established as a therapeutic strategy in patients with low-risk prostate cancer. Demographic and anatomopathological factors that increase the probability of reclassifying patients have been identified. Materials and Methods Laboratory and histopathological data were collected from 116 patients included on AS since 2014. Univariate analysis was performed with Chi-square, t-student and Kendall's Tau, multivariate analysis according to logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier curves were calculated. Results Of the 116 patients in AS, the median age at diagnosis was 66 years and the median follow-up was 13 months (2-72). Of these, 61 (52.6%) are still on surveillance, while 55 (47.4%) have left the program, mostly due to histological progression (52 patients (45.2%)); radical prostatectomy was performed in 27 (49.1%). Prostate volume (PV) ≤ 60cc and the number of positive cylinders > 1 in diagnostic biopsy (p = 0.05) were associated with higher reclassification rate in univariate analysis (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that these two variables significantly correlated with higher reclassification rate (PV 60 cc: OR 4.39, p = 0.04; > 1 positive cylinder at diagnostic biopsy: OR 2.48, p = 0.03). Conclusions It has been shown that initial ultrasound volume and the number of positive cylinders in the diagnostic biopsy are independent risk factors for reclassification. Initial PSA, laterality of the affected cylinders and PSA density were not predictive factors of progression in our series (AU)

Serum Insulin-like Factor 3, Testosterone, and LH in Experimental and Therapeutic Testicular Suppression.

BACKGROUND: Serum insulin-like factor 3 (INSL3) is a Leydig cell biomarker, but little is known about the circulating concentration of INSL3 during hypothalamus-pituitary-testicular suppression. AIM: To study the concomitant changes in serum concentrations of INSL3, testosterone, and LH during experimental and therapeutic testicular suppression. METHODS: We included serum samples from 3 different cohorts comprising subjects before and after testicular suppression: (1) 6 healthy young men who were treated with androgens (Sustanon, Aspen Pharma, Dublin, Ireland); 2) 10 transgender girls (male sex assigned at birth) who were treated with 3-monthly GnRH agonist injections (Leuprorelinacetat, Abacus Medicine, Copenhagen, Denmark); and (3) 55 patients with prostate cancer who were randomized to surgical castration (bilateral subcapsular orchiectomy) or treatment with GnRH agonist (Triptorelin, Ipsen Pharma, Kista, Sweden). Serum INSL3 and testosterone concentrations were quantified in stored serum samples using validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry methodologies, and LH was measured by an ultrasensitive immunoassay. RESULTS: The circulating concentrations of INSL3, testosterone, and LH decreased during experimental testicular suppression in healthy young men by Sustanon injections and subsequently returned to baseline levels after release of suppression. All 3 hormones decreased during therapeutic hormonal hypothalamus-pituitary-testicular suppression in transgender girls and in patients with prostate cancer. CONCLUSION: INSL3 resembles testosterone as a sensitive marker of testicular suppression and reflects Leydig cell function, also during exposure to exogenous testosterone. Serum INSL3 measurements may complement testosterone as a Leydig cell marker in male reproductive disorders, during therapeutic testicular suppression as well as in surveillance of illicit use of androgens.

American Indian/Alaska Native men are less likely to receive prostate-specific antigen testing and digital rectal exams from primary care providers than White men: a secondary analysis of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey from 2012-2018.

PURPOSE: (1) Identify the proportion of primary care visits in which American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) men receive a prostate-specific antigen test (PSAT)and/or a digital rectal exam (DRE), (2) describe characteristics of primary care visits in which AI/AN receive PSA and/or DRE, and (3) identify whether AI/AN receive PSA and/or DRE less often than non-Hispanic White (nHW) men. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) during 2013-2016 and 2018 and the NAMCS Community Health Center (CHC) datasets from 2012-2015. Weighted bivariate and multivariable tests analyzed the data to account for the complex survey design. RESULTS: For AI/AN men, 1.67 per 100 visits (95% CI = 0-4.24) included a PSATs (or PSAT) and 0 visits included a DRE between 2013-2016 and 2018. The rate of PSA for non-AI/AN men was 9.35 per 100 visits (95% CI = 7.78-10.91) and 2.52 per 100 visits (95% CI = 1.61-3.42) for DRE. AI/AN men were significantly less likely to receive a PSA than nHW men (aOR = 0.09, 95% CI = 0.01-0.83). In CHCs, AI/AN men experienced 4.26 PSAT per 100 visits (95% CI = 0.96-7.57) compared to 5.00 PSAT per 100 visits (95% CI = 4.40-5.68) for non-AI/AN men. DRE rates for AI/AN men was 0.63 per 100 visits (95% CI = 0-1.61) compared to 1.05 per 100 (95% CI = 0.74-1.37) for non-AI/AN men. There was not a statistically significant disparity in the CHC data regarding PSA (OR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.42-1.98) or DRE (OR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.15-3.74), compared to nHW men. CONCLUSION: Efforts are needed to better understand why providers may not use PSA and DRE with AI/AN men compared to nHW men.

A big data-based prediction model for prostate cancer incidence in Japanese men.

To define a normal range for PSA values (ng/mL) by age and create a prediction model for prostate cancer incidence. We conducted a retrospective analysis using 263,073 observations of PSA values in Japanese men aged 18-98 years (2007-2017), including healthy men and those diagnosed with prostate cancer. Percentiles for 262,639 PSA observations in healthy men aged 18-70 years were calculated and plotted to elucidate the normal fluctuation range for PSA values by age. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to develop a predictive model for prostate cancer incidence. PSA levels and PSA velocity increased with age in healthy men. However, there was no difference in PSA velocity with age in men diagnosed with prostate cancer. Logistic regression analysis showed an increased risk of prostate cancer for PSA slopes ranging from 0.5 to 3.5 ng/mL/year. This study provides age-specific normal fluctuation ranges for PSA levels in men aged 18-75 years and presents a novel and personalized prediction model for prostate cancer incidence. We found that PSA slope values of > 3.5 ng/mL/year may indicate a rapid increase in PSA levels caused by pathological condition such as inflammation but are unlikely to indicate cancer risk.

Fifteen-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Between 1999 and 2009 in the United Kingdom, 82,429 men between 50 and 69 years of age received a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test. Localized prostate cancer was diagnosed in 2664 men. Of these men, 1643 were enrolled in a trial to evaluate the effectiveness of treatments, with 545 randomly assigned to receive active monitoring, 553 to undergo prostatectomy, and 545 to undergo radiotherapy. METHODS: At a median follow-up of 15 years (range, 11 to 21), we compared the results in this population with respect to death from prostate cancer (the primary outcome) and death from any cause, metastases, disease progression, and initiation of long-term androgen-deprivation therapy (secondary outcomes). RESULTS: Follow-up was complete for 1610 patients (98%). A risk-stratification analysis showed that more than one third of the men had intermediate or high-risk disease at diagnosis. Death from prostate cancer occurred in 45 men (2.7%): 17 (3.1%) in the active-monitoring group, 12 (2.2%) in the prostatectomy group, and 16 (2.9%) in the radiotherapy group (P = 0.53 for the overall comparison). Death from any cause occurred in 356 men (21.7%), with similar numbers in all three groups. Metastases developed in 51 men (9.4%) in the active-monitoring group, in 26 (4.7%) in the prostatectomy group, and in 27 (5.0%) in the radiotherapy group. Long-term androgen-deprivation therapy was initiated in 69 men (12.7%), 40 (7.2%), and 42 (7.7%), respectively; clinical progression occurred in 141 men (25.9%), 58 (10.5%), and 60 (11.0%), respectively. In the active-monitoring group, 133 men (24.4%) were alive without any prostate cancer treatment at the end of follow-up. No differential effects on cancer-specific mortality were noted in relation to the baseline PSA level, tumor stage or grade, or risk-stratification score. No treatment complications were reported after the 10-year analysis. CONCLUSIONS: After 15 years of follow-up, prostate cancer-specific mortality was low regardless of the treatment assigned. Thus, the choice of therapy involves weighing trade-offs between benefits and harms associated with treatments for localized prostate cancer. (Funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research; ProtecT Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN20141297; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02044172.).

The Relationship between the SUVmax Value Obtained in Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT and Lactate Dehydrogenase and Alkaline Phosphatase in Prostate Cancer

Objectives: ALP and LDH are serum markers of prognostic importance in prostate cancer patients. PET/CT imaging with Ga-68 PSMA has played an important role in prostate cancer imaging in recent years. Our aim in this study was to evaluate the relationship and prognostic significance between SUVmax values obtained with Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT and LDH and ALP levels in prostate cancer patients. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 61 prostate cancer patients who had Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT imaging and who did not have a prostatectomy between 2019 and 2020. PSA, ALP and LDH levels were measured in all patients before or after imaging within a maximum of 28 days. Results: The median age of the patients included in this study was 73 (range: 57–89) and all 61 patients were prostatic adenocarcinoma. 50 (82%) of the patients had distant metastasis in Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT. There was a significant positive correlation between serum LDH and PSA levels. There was a positive correlation between serum ALP and PSA levels. A negative correlation was found between ALP levels and prostate SUVmax. Conclusions: While negative correlation was found between SUVmax and ALP levels, no correlation was found between LDH levels and SUVmax. High ALP levels were found to be related to metastasis rates and severity and high serum PSA levels (AU)

Objetivos: ALP y LDH son marcadores séricos deimportancia pronóstica en pacientes con cáncer de próstata.Las imágenes de PET/CT con Ga-68 PSMA han jugado unpapel importante en las imágenes de cáncer de próstata enlos últimos años. Nuestro objetivo en este estudio fue evaluar la relación y la importancia pronóstica entre los valores de SUVmax obtenidos con Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT ylos niveles de LDH y ALP en pacientes con cáncer de próstata.Métodos: Evaluamos retrospectivamente a 61 pacientes con cáncer de próstata que se sometieron a imágenes de PET/CT con Ga-68 PSMA y que no se sometierona prostatectomía entre 2019 y 2020. Los niveles de PSA,ALP y LDH se midieron en todos los pacientes antes o después de la obtención de imágenes en un plazo máximo de28 días.Resultados: La mediana de edad de los pacientes incluidos en este estudio fue de 73 (rango: 57–89) y los 61pacientes eran adenocarcinoma de próstata. 50 (82%) delos pacientes tenían metástasis a distancia en Ga-68 PSMAPET/CT. Hubo una correlación positiva significativa entrelos niveles séricos de LDH y PSA. Hubo una correlaciónpositiva entre los niveles séricos de ALP y PSA. Se encontró una correlación negativa entre los niveles de ALP y elSUVmáx prostático.Conclusiones: Si bien se encontró una correlaciónnegativa entre los niveles de SUVmáx y ALP, no se encontró correlación entre los niveles de LDH y el SUVmáx. Seencontró que los niveles altos de ALP estaban relacionadoscon las tasas de metástasis y la gravedad y los niveles altosde PSA en suero. (AU)

Deep whole-genome ctDNA chronology of treatment-resistant prostate cancer.

Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) in blood plasma is an emerging tool for clinical cancer genotyping and longitudinal disease monitoring1. However, owing to past emphasis on targeted and low-resolution profiling approaches, our understanding of the distinct populations that comprise bulk ctDNA is incomplete2-12. Here we perform deep whole-genome sequencing of serial plasma and synchronous metastases in patients with aggressive prostate cancer. We comprehensively assess all classes of genomic alterations and show that ctDNA contains multiple dominant populations, the evolutionary histories of which frequently indicate whole-genome doubling and shifts in mutational processes. Although tissue and ctDNA showed concordant clonally expanded cancer driver alterations, most individual metastases contributed only a minor share of total ctDNA. By comparing serial ctDNA before and after clinical progression on potent inhibitors of the androgen receptor (AR) pathway, we reveal population restructuring converging solely on AR augmentation as the dominant genomic driver of acquired treatment resistance. Finally, we leverage nucleosome footprints in ctDNA to infer mRNA expression in synchronously biopsied metastases, including treatment-induced changes in AR transcription factor signalling activity. Our results provide insights into cancer biology and show that liquid biopsy can be used as a tool for comprehensive multi-omic discovery.

The Influence of the Pretreatment Immune State on Response to Radiation Therapy in High-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Validation Study From NRG/RTOG 0521.

PURPOSE: The immunoinflammatory state has been shown to be associated with poor outcomes after radiation therapy (RT). We conducted an a priori designed validation study using serum specimens from Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0521. It was hypothesized the pretreatment inflammatory state would correlate with clinical outcomes. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients on RTOG 0521 had serum banked for biomarker validation. This study was designed to validate previous findings showing an association between elevations in C-reactive protein (CRP) and shorter biochemical disease free survival (bDFS). CRP levels were measured in pretreatment samples. An exploratory panel of related cytokines was also measured including: monocyte chemotactic protein-1, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, interferon-γ, interleukin (IL)-1b, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, IL-13, IL-17A, IL-23, and tumor necrosis factor. The primary endpoint examined was bDFS. Additional exploratory endpoints included overall survival, distant metastases, and toxicity events attributed to RT. RESULTS: Two hundred and two patients in RTOG/NRG 0521 had serum samples available. Median age was 66 years (48-83), and 90% of patients were White. There was not an association between CRP and bDFS (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.07 per 1 log increase in CRP; 95% confidence interval, 0.83-1.38; P = .60). In the exploratory, unplanned analysis, pretreatment IL-10 was significantly associated with worse bDFS (adjusted HR, 1.61 per log increase; P = .0027) and distant metastases (HR, 1.55 per log increase; P = .028). The association of IL-10 with bDFS was maintained on a multiplicity adjustment. The exploratory analyses of pretreatment levels of interferon-γ, IL-1b, IL-2, IL-13, IL-23 were negatively associated with grade 2 or higher pollakiuria (adjusted odds ratio, 0.64, 0.65, 0.71, 0.72, and 0.74, respectively, all P < .05), and IL-6 was negatively associated with grade 2 or higher erectile dysfunction (odds ratio, 0.62; P = .027). CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment CRP was not associated with a poorer bDFS after RT. In a hypothesis- generating analysis, higher baseline levels of IL-10 were associated with lower rates of bDFS. These findings require additional prospective evaluation.

Plain language summary of the HERO study comparing relugolix with leuprolide for men with advanced prostate cancer.

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: This is a summary of a research study (known as a clinical trial) called HERO. The HERO study compared how well relugolix and leuprolide worked in lowering blood testosterone to sustained castration levels in men with advanced prostate cancer. Sustained castration is a blood testosterone level below 50 ng/dl from Day 29 through 48 weeks of treatment. WHAT WERE THE RESULTS?: Researchers looked at 930 adult men with advanced prostate cancer: 622 of these men took relugolix (by mouth once daily) and 308 received leuprolide (injected every 3 months). The HERO study showed that more men taking relugolix (97%) achieved sustained castration through 48 weeks than men receiving leuprolide (89%). This decrease in testosterone also happened more quickly in men taking relugolix. In 184 men who were followed up for 90 days after completing treatment, blood levels of testosterone returned to normal in more men who took relugolix than men who received leuprolide. Side effects were similar among men taking relugolix or receiving leuprolide, and most were identified as mild or moderate in terms of how bad they were. WHAT DO THE RESULTS OF THE STUDY MEAN?: In men with advanced prostate cancer and compared with those receiving leuprolide, more men taking relugolix had lower levels of blood testosterone. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT number: NCT03085095.